Questions on test: 39 unlock

[Evert | Rooftop]

On 4-Nov-08, at 8:34 PM, John Meissen wrote:
>
> So I suppose one could argue that as long as the lock no longer exists
> then a successful response should be sent. In the interests of  
> passing the
> test I changed my approach to return success if the request was for  
> a lock
> on a resource that no longer exists, since any lock which may have  
> existed
> has already been deleted.
>
I think those clauses should be interpreted as :

   * a successful unlock will always remove the lock altogether
   * if an unlock was successful, there could still be other (shared)  
locks on the
     same resource. So a successful unlock doesn't mean the resource  
is unlocked

I'm going to ask more detail on the w3c-dist-auth mailing list on what  
should happen
in this situation.

Evert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2433 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/litmus/attachments/20081104/cea377b2/attachment-0006.bin