Inconsistency between propfind_invalid2 and propnullns?
Tobias Schlitt
ts at ez.no
Thu Sep 4 02:05:20 EDT 2008
Hi Joe,
On 09/04/2008 01:59 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 06:28:52PM +0200, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>> I needed to switch namespace validation off for the point that libxml2
>> already indicates that DAV: is not a valid namespace URI. Therefore the
>> incorrect namespace test was not caught before and my manual consistency
>> checks resulted in the propnulls test failed, too.
>>
>> I'll try to find another workaround to libxmls behaviour.
> Ah, that's a tough one; the situation there is, IIRC, that DAV: was an
> invalid URI according to the older URI spec grammar. The newer URI RFC
> (3986) was updated to allow DAV: as a valid URI; I had a brief word with
> Daniel Veillard and he said that libxml2 has been updated to handle that
> (not sure if that code has been released yet, though).
Yes, I also found some mailinglist threads about that. For now, I think,
I will just go an let those Litmus tests fail. Otherwise I would have to
iterate through all libxml errors in my server and parse the messages
manually, since this seems to be the only way PHP supports to react on
different libxml errors.
On the other side, are these tests so important that it is worth having
2 real failures in the Litmus runs? Wouldn't a warning make more sense
here? At least I experienced several WebDAV clients to work fine even if
those tests fail. That said, most WebDAV clients are borked anyway. ;)
Regards,
Toby
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen / With kind regards
Tobias Schlitt (GPG: 0xC462BC14) eZ Components Developer
ts at ez.no | eZ Systems AS | ez.no
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/litmus/attachments/20080904/1073129d/attachment-0006.bin
More information about the litmus
mailing list