patches and contribution

Ricardo Rocha ricardo.rocha at cern.ch
Fri Dec 9 05:18:07 EST 2011


That's great!

Thanks a lot, just saved us some work.

We might come with new patches later, but none for now. Let us know
when you do the release and we'll enable it in our nightlies to see
how it goes.

I'll keep you posted on the packaging, i'll have some time for it next week.

Thanks again,
Ricardo

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Joe Orton <joe at manyfish.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Ricardo Rocha wrote:
>> Hi Joe.
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply, we were afraid the package was not
>> supported anymore.
>>
>> Here's the pointer to the ticket that triggered this:
>> https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/lcgdm/ticket/379#comment:3
>>
>> As you mention the issue is with the bundled version of neon yes. The
>> one in Fedora/EPEL seems to have proper support to deal with the
>> missing SSL_SESSION_* symbols in openssl >= 1.0.
>
> Right, that one is fixed in neon 0.29.0 and later.
>
>> I cc Alejandro that actually just forked the code into our repo and is
>> looking into it - if you have an easier way to simply use the system
>> instead of the bundled neon version then that's great.
>
> Just pass --with-neon to configure.
>
>> On another note, we have another patch Alejandro had submitted in May
>> to which we got no reply, maybe we could sneak it in too?
>> http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/litmus/2011-May/000327.html
>
> Ah, I missed that, sorry.  Committed now to SVN.
>
> Do you have any other patches imminent?  I'll push out a new release
> which supports neon 0.29.x and with the client cert patch in otherwise.
>
> Regards, Joe



More information about the litmus mailing list